Briones v. Avram

• Court: District Court, D. Nevada
• Decided: September 22, 2025
• Docket: 2:24-cv-00215
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6

7 RICHI BRIONES, Case No. 2:24-cv-00215-RFB-NJK 8 Plaintiffs, Order 9 v. [Docket Nos. 60, 61, 64] 10 DR. MIRIT AVRAM, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the conflict of interest motion and 13 all other motions he filed.1 Docket No. 64. 14 On September 9, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice with the Court regarding an alleged conflict 15 of interest in Plaintiff’s attorneys’ client representations. Docket No. 59. On September 9 and 10, 16 2025, Plaintiff filed motions requesting the Court produce information regarding Plaintiff’s 17 attorneys’ “visiting list” and case load. Docket Nos. 60, 61. On September 15, 2025, Plaintiff 18 filed a notice with the Court alleging that Plaintiff’s attorneys’ clients were retaliating against him 19 and that his attorneys faced a conflict of interest in their client representations. Docket No. 63. 20 On September 22, 2025, Plaintiff filed the instant motion. Docket No. 64. 21 In the instant motion, Plaintiff states that “[t]here is no conflict of interest with [Plaintiff’s 22 attorneys]” and requests that Plaintiff’s attorneys continue to represent him in all cases presently 23 before the Court. Docket No. 64 at 1. Plaintiff submits that his previous submissions with the 24 Court regarding the alleged conflict of interest were the result of his worsening mental health 25 condition. Id. Plaintiff requests that the Court “[p]lease dismiss that motion as [there] is no 26 27 1 The Court liberally construes the filings of pro se litigants, particularly those who are 28 prisoners bringing civil rights claims. Blaisdell v. Frappiea, 729 F.3d 1237, 1241 (9th Cir. 2013). 1} conflict of interest at this time or ever” and, further dismiss all previous motions regarding the 2|| alleged conflict of interest. /d. at 3. 3 Accordingly, the instant motion is GRANTED. Docket No. 64. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's previous motions regarding the alleged conflict of interest. Docket Nos. 60, 61. The Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to strike Plaintiffs notices regarding the conflict of interest from 6]| the docket. Docket Nos. 59, 63. The Court further INSTRUCTS Plaintiffs attorneys to file any 7|| necessary motion regarding his mental health. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: September 22, 2025 en Zo . Nancy J. Kopp& 11 United States Magistrate Judge

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28