Brio v. Conduent Care Management Incorporated

D. Arizona

Brio v. Conduent Care Management Incorporated

DecidedDecember 14, 2022

Docket4:21-cv-00526

StatusUnknown

This text of Brio v. Conduent Care Management Incorporated (Brio v. Conduent Care Management Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brio v. Conduent Care Management Incorporated, (D. Ariz. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Alina Brio, ) No. CV 21-526-TUC-JAS (MSA) ) 10 Plaintiff, ) ORDER ) 11 vs. ) ) 12 ) Conduent Care Management, Inc., et al. ) 13 ) Defendants. ) 14 ) ) 15 16 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 17 Magistrate Judge Aguilera. 18 A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report 19 and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not 20 consider any objections or new evidence. 21 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s 22 recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; 23 Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 24 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s 26 Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) is accepted and adopted; (2) The motion to compel 27 arbitration/dismiss (Doc. 9) is granted; (3) The parties shall promptly submit their dispute to 28 arbitration pursuant to the Dispute Resolution Policy and Rules; (4) This case is dismissed 1 || without prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this 2 || case. ; Dated this 14th day of December, 2022. 5 7 | ro Aico ° Honorable James A. Soto 10 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Alina Brio, ) No. CV 21-526-TUC-JAS (MSA) ) 10 Plaintiff, ) ORDER ) 11 vs. ) ) 12 ) Conduent Care Management, Inc., et al. ) 13 ) Defendants. ) 14 ) ) 15 16 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 17 Magistrate Judge Aguilera. 18 A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report 19 and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not 20 consider any objections or new evidence. 21 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s 22 recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; 23 Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 24 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s 26 Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) is accepted and adopted; (2) The motion to compel 27 arbitration/dismiss (Doc. 9) is granted; (3) The parties shall promptly submit their dispute to 28 arbitration pursuant to the Dispute Resolution Policy and Rules; (4) This case is dismissed 1 || without prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this 2 || case. ; Dated this 14th day of December, 2022. 5 7 | ro Aico ° Honorable James A. Soto 10 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Brio v. Conduent Care Management Incorporated, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brio-v-conduent-care-management-incorporated-azd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack