Brintnell v. Eckles Et Ux.

132 So. 696, 101 Fla. 816
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 6, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 132 So. 696 (Brintnell v. Eckles Et Ux.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brintnell v. Eckles Et Ux., 132 So. 696, 101 Fla. 816 (Fla. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a motion to advance for early consideration and disposition. It does not come within the rule to advance but by its terms it may be treated as a motion to quash. It is so treated and is granted on authority of Norfleet Holding Company vs. Price, filed February 5, 1931.

Strum, C.J., and . Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 So. 696, 101 Fla. 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brintnell-v-eckles-et-ux-fla-1931.