Brinson v. State

48 So. 3d 915, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17631, 2010 WL 4628691
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 2010·No. 2D09-2366·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

David Brinson, Jr., challenges his robbery sentence, which was imposed upon resentencing after reversal of his violent career criminal (VCC) sentence. See Brinson v. State, 995 So.2d 1047, 1049 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). We affirm Brinson’s sentence without comment. We remand for the limited purpose of correcting a scrivener’s error which appears on the face of the judgment. The written judgment correctly reflects that Brinson was convicted of a second-degree felony, but it incorrectly identifies that felony as armed robbery, which is actually a first-degree felony. See § 810.02(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999). Accordingly, we remand with instructions that the trial court correct the written judgment to reflect that Brinson was convicted of the second-degree felony of robbery. See Newson v. State, 867 So.2d 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Affirmed; remanded to correct scrivener’s error.

NORTHCUTT and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brinson v. State, 48 So. 3d 915, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17631, 2010 WL 4628691 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

48 So. 3d 915 (Brinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matthews v. State
48 So. 3d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)