Brinson v. Mims & Thomas Manufacturing Co.
This text of 186 So. 2d 495 (Brinson v. Mims & Thomas Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida [496]*496Industrial Commission bearing date November 17, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essen-" tial requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 So. 2d 495, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brinson-v-mims-thomas-manufacturing-co-fla-1966.