Brinson v. Brinson

59 S.E. 711, 3 Ga. App. 223, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 601
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 9, 1907·No. 673·Published

Opinion

Rowell, J.

1. The evidence was legally sufficient to support the verdict.

2. The assignments of error as to the admission of testimony are fatally defective, in that they do not state what objection was made thereto when it was offered. Blackburn v. Woodward, 128 Ga. 226 (57 S. E. 318); McFarland v. Darien R. Co., 127 Ga. 97 (2), (56 S. E. 74); Howard Supply Co. v. Bunn, 127 Ga. 664 (5), (56 S. E. 757). See also Lewis v. Hutchinson, 127 Ga. 790 (3), (56 S. E. 998).

3. None of the other exceptions are meritorious. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brinson v. Brinson, 59 S.E. 711, 3 Ga. App. 223, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 601 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

59 S.E. 711 (Brinson v. Brinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McFarland v. Darien & Western Railroad
56 S.E. 74 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Howard Supply Co. v. Bunn
56 S.E. 757 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Lewis, Robinson & Co. v. Hutchinson
56 S.E. 998 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Blackburn v. Woodward
57 S.E. 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)