Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Brinson v. Brinson

Brinson v. Brinson

59 S.E. 711, 3 Ga. App. 223, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 601
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 9, 1907
Docket673
StatusPublished

This text of 59 S.E. 711 (Brinson v. Brinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brinson v. Brinson, 59 S.E. 711, 3 Ga. App. 223, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 601 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Rowell, J.

1. The evidence was legally sufficient to support the verdict.

2. The assignments of error as to the admission of testimony are fatally defective, in that they do not state what objection was made thereto when it was offered. Blackburn v. Woodward, 128 Ga. 226 (57 S. E. 318); McFarland v. Darien R. Co., 127 Ga. 97 (2), (56 S. E. 74); Howard Supply Co. v. Bunn, 127 Ga. 664 (5), (56 S. E. 757). See also Lewis v. Hutchinson, 127 Ga. 790 (3), (56 S. E. 998).

3. None of the other exceptions are meritorious. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McFarland v. Darien & Western Railroad
56 S.E. 74 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Howard Supply Co. v. Bunn
56 S.E. 757 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Lewis, Robinson & Co. v. Hutchinson
56 S.E. 998 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Blackburn v. Woodward
57 S.E. 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 S.E. 711, 3 Ga. App. 223, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brinson-v-brinson-gactapp-1907.