Brinn v. J. I. Kagno & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brinn v. J. I. Kagno & Co.

251 A.D. 891, 298 N.Y.S. 635, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8182

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D. 891 (Brinn v. J. I. Kagno & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brinn v. J. I. Kagno & Co., 251 A.D. 891, 298 N.Y.S. 635, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by the infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries and by plaintiff Hyman Brinn, his father, to recover for medical expenses and loss of services. Appeal by the plaintiffs from judgment in their own favor on the ground of inadequacy, and from an order denying their motion to set aside the verdict. Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event, unless within twenty days after entry of the order hereon the defendant stipulate to increase the verdict in favor of Benjamin Brinn to the sum of $1,500 and the verdict in favor of Hyman Brinn to the sum of $500; in which event the judgment, as so increased, is unanimously affirmed, and the appeal from the order dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Cars-well, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by the infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries and by plaintiff Hyman Brinn, his father, to recover for medical expenses and loss of services. Appeal by the plaintiffs from judgment in their own favor on the ground of inadequacy, and from an order denying their motion to set aside the verdict. Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event, unless within twenty days after entry of the order hereon the defendant stipulate to increase the verdict in favor of Benjamin Brinn to the sum of $1,500 and the verdict in favor of Hyman Brinn to the sum of $500; in which event the judgment, as so increased, is unanimously affirmed, and the appeal from the order dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Cars-well, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D. 891, 298 N.Y.S. 635, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brinn-v-j-i-kagno-co-nyappdiv-1937.