Brinley v. Nevins
168 A.D. 948
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1915
StatusPublished
This text of 168 A.D. 948 (Brinley v. Nevins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brinley v. Nevins, 168 A.D. 948 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.; Ingraham, P. J., dissented on dissenting opinion upon former appeal. (See 162 App. Div. 744, 747.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brinley v. Nevins
162 A.D. 744 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
168 A.D. 948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brinley-v-nevins-nyappdiv-1915.