Brinkman v. Oil Transfer Corp.
274 A.D. 985, 84 N.Y.S.2d 457
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 1948·Published
Opinions
The circumstance that the parent paid for some of the items of maintenance and cure, without express agreement providing for reimbursement by a minor son, ought not to relieve the defendant from the obligation to pay therefor.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brinkman v. Oil Transfer Corp., 274 A.D. 985, 84 N.Y.S.2d 457 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).
274 A.D. 985 (Brinkman v. Oil Transfer Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Calmar Steamship Corp. v. Taylor
303 U.S. 525 (Supreme Court, 1938)
Johnson v. United States
333 U.S. 46 (Supreme Court, 1948)
Bailey v. City of New York
153 F.2d 427 (Second Circuit, 1946)
Field v. Waterman SS Corporation
104 F.2d 849 (Fifth Circuit, 1939)
United States v. Johnson
160 F.2d 789 (Ninth Circuit, 1947)
Robinson v. Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd.
33 F. Supp. 93 (S.D. California, 1940)
Sonnesen v. Panama Transport Co.
82 N.E.2d 569 (New York Court of Appeals, 1948)
Brinkman v. Oil Transfer Corp.
185 Misc. 257 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)
The Kenilworth
144 F. 376 (Third Circuit, 1906)
The Bouker No. 2
241 F. 831 (Second Circuit, 1917)
The Santa Barbara
263 F. 369 (Second Circuit, 1920)