Brinkman v. . Cram

122 N.E. 887, 225 N.Y. 720, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 1261
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 25, 1919
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 122 N.E. 887 (Brinkman v. . Cram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brinkman v. . Cram, 122 N.E. 887, 225 N.Y. 720, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 1261 (N.Y. 1919).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: Hogan, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Palazzo v. Hyde
82 Misc. 2d 765 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)
Scherer v. Pfuntner
207 Misc. 7 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Tanager Construction Corp.
276 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
In re the Estate of Hyde
177 Misc. 666 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1941)
Walker v. Carroll
123 Misc. 712 (New York Supreme Court, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 N.E. 887, 225 N.Y. 720, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 1261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brinkman-v-cram-ny-1919.