Brinkman v. . Cram
122 N.E. 887, 225 N.Y. 720, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 1261
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: Hogan, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brinkman v. . Cram, 122 N.E. 887, 225 N.Y. 720, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 1261 (N.Y. 1919).
122 N.E. 887 (Brinkman v. . Cram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Palazzo v. Hyde
82 Misc. 2d 765 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)
Scherer v. Pfuntner
207 Misc. 7 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Tanager Construction Corp.
276 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
In re the Estate of Hyde
177 Misc. 666 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1941)
Walker v. Carroll
123 Misc. 712 (New York Supreme Court, 1923)