Brinkman v. Brinkman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brinkman v. Brinkman

477 S.W.3d 696, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1259, 2015 WL 8230696

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 8, 2015

DocketED 102234

StatusPublished

This text of 477 S.W.3d 696 (Brinkman v. Brinkman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brinkman v. Brinkman, 477 S.W.3d 696, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1259, 2015 WL 8230696 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Tammy Brinkman (“Mother”) appeals from the trial court’s Judgment and Decree of Dissolution of marriage from Richard Brinkman (“Father”). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Tammy Brinkman (“Mother”) appeals from the trial court’s Judgment and Decree of Dissolution of marriage from Richard Brinkman (“Father”). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

477 S.W.3d 696, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1259, 2015 WL 8230696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brinkman-v-brinkman-moctapp-2015.