Brinkley v. United States

474 F. App'x 151
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 12, 2012
DocketNo. 12-6176
StatusPublished

This text of 474 F. App'x 151 (Brinkley v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brinkley v. United States, 474 F. App'x 151 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Eugene Brinkley appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006) this action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Brinkley v. United States, No. 5:10-ct-03084-B O (E.D.N.C. Mar. 11, 2011) & 2012 WL 78376 (Jan. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 F. App'x 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brinkley-v-united-states-ca4-2012.