Brinkley v. State

884 So. 2d 125, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9961, 2004 WL 1494677
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brinkley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 874 So. 2d 1199
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 7, 2004·No. No. 2D04-400·Published

Opinion

VILLANTI, Judge.

Fred Allen Brinkley appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the trial court’s denial because the record conclusively refutes Brinkley’s claim. However, we affirm without prejudice to any [126]*126right Brinkley may have to challenge the forfeiture of gain time through the appropriate administrative remedies with the Department of Corrections and then by way of petition for writ of mandamus in the appropriate circuit court. See Clements v. State, 761 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and STRINGER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brinkley v. State, 884 So. 2d 125, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9961, 2004 WL 1494677 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

884 So. 2d 125 (Brinkley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clements v. State
761 So. 2d 1245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)