Brinkley v. Naughton

33 Misc. 752, 67 N.Y.S. 83
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 33 Misc. 752 (Brinkley v. Naughton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brinkley v. Naughton, 33 Misc. 752, 67 N.Y.S. 83 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mo question of law being presented by the record, and the judgment having been rendered on conflicting evidence, there must he an affirmance.

Present: Beekmah, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gormah, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Misc. 752, 67 N.Y.S. 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brinkley-v-naughton-nyappterm-1900.