Brinkley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

CLYDE BRINKLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-23-112-D ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) [Doc. No. 17] and Brief in Support [Doc. No. 18]. The EAJA permits an award of attorney fees and expenses to a prevailing plaintiff in certain actions against the Government, including Social Security claims. In this case, Plaintiff sought review of Defendant’s decision to deny Plaintiff disability benefits. The Court reversed Defendant’s decision and remanded the matter for further proceedings [Doc. Nos. 15, 16]. Defendant does not dispute that Plaintiff is a “prevailing party” within the meaning of the EAJA and is thus entitled to an award of reasonable attorney fees. See, e.g., Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). In his Motion, Plaintiff initially sought an award of $9,008.05 for 35.35 hours of attorney time and 3.8 hours of paralegal time for the services performed in this case. Plaintiff’s counsel has submitted documentation reflecting the work performed and the time incurred for the services rendered. See Motion for Att’y Fees, Ex. 1 [Doc. No. 17-1]. Per Defendant’s Response [Doc. No. 19], the parties have since come to an agreement that an EAJA award of $7,600.00 is reasonable in this case. Defendant adds that payment must be made directly to Plaintiff as the prevailing party in accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010) and Manning v. Astrue, 510 F.3d 1246 (10th Cir. 2007). Furthermore, if Plaintiff’s counsel is ultimately granted attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), counsel must refund the smaller of the EAJA or the § 406(b) award to Plaintiff. Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). The Court has reviewed the documentation submitted by Plaintiff and finds that the agreed-upon fee of $7,600.00 is supported by the documentation. Further, the Court finds that the requested amount represents a fair and reasonable fee for the work performed by Plaintiff’s counsel in this case. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion [Doc. No. 17] is GRANTED IN PART. An EAJA attorney fee award in the agreed upon amount of $7,600.00 is approved. Defendant is ordered to pay that amount directly to Plaintiff, in accordance with the requirements of the EAJA and the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, and may do so by forwarding the amount to Plaintiff in care of his attorney. Further, if additional legal fees are awarded pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), Plaintiff’s counsel is ordered to refund the smaller amount to Plaintiff as required by Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986). IT IS SO ORDERED this 5" day of October, 2023.

\ ~ □ □□ OOP TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI Chief United States District Judge