Brinkley v. City University

92 A.D.2d 805, 460 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17183
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 17, 1983
DocketClaim No. 66167
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 92 A.D.2d 805 (Brinkley v. City University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brinkley v. City University, 92 A.D.2d 805, 460 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17183 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

— Order, Court of Claims of the State of New York (Orlando, J.), entered April 26, 1982, granting claimant’s motion to [806]*806dismiss the third and fourth affirmative defenses of the answer, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the motion denied, such denial being without prejudice to a motion for late filing relief. This claim arises out of an incident which occurred on March 26,1981, when claimant was allegedly struck by a falling metal closet in a Hunter College dormitory. Since City University of New York (CUNY) is subject to the same time limitations as apply to State agencies, and it is conceded that neither a claim nor a notice of intention to file a claim was filed within 90 days of the accrual of the claim, as is required (Education Law, § 6224, subd 4; Court of Claims Act, § 10, subd 3), the claim was untimely. (Jones v City Univ. ofN. Y., 57 NY2d 984.) Moreover, claimant failed to serve CUNY. Service upon the Attorney-General, CUNY’s attorney, is not service upon CUNY. (See Gold v City of New York, 80 AD2d 138.) In addition to the usual service and filing requirements imposed by the Court of Claims Act, in any claim brought against it, CUNY must also be served with any claim or notice of intention to file a claim. (See Jones v City Univ. ofN. Y., supra; Education Law, § 6224, subd 2, as amd by L 1982, ch 711, eff July 22, 1982.) This disposition is without prejudice to an application for late-filing relief (Court of Claims Act, § 10, subd 6). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Silverman, Fein and Alexander, JJ. [113 Mise 2d 732.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Udeogalanya v. Kiho
2019 NY Slip Op 1251 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Johnson v. State
71 A.D.3d 1355 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Flynn v. City University of New York at Brooklyn College
6 A.D.3d 656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Ibekweh v. State
259 A.D.2d 397 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
L. F. O'Connell Associates, Inc. v. State
176 Misc. 2d 697 (New York State Court of Claims, 1998)
Scalise v. State
210 A.D.2d 916 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Ibekweh v. State
157 Misc. 2d 710 (New York State Court of Claims, 1993)
Hoffman v. State
184 A.D.2d 331 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Finnerty v. New York State Thruway Authority
550 N.E.2d 441 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
Shimmerlik v. City University of New York
142 Misc. 2d 118 (New York State Court of Claims, 1988)
Finnerty v. New York State Thruway Authority
140 A.D.2d 941 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Muller v. State
108 A.D.2d 181 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Krales v. City University
128 Misc. 2d 168 (New York State Court of Claims, 1985)
In re Crespo
123 Misc. 2d 862 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
Jones v. City University of New York
118 Misc. 2d 940 (New York State Court of Claims, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 A.D.2d 805, 460 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brinkley-v-city-university-nyappdiv-1983.