Brinkerhoff v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brinkerhoff v. Pennsylvania Railroad

249 A.D. 923, 293 N.Y.S. 500, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10173

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brinkerhoff v. Pennsylvania Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 245 A.D. 561 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 1937·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. AU concur, except Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and dismissal of the complaint for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion on the former appeal (245 App. Div. 561). (The judgment awards plaintiff damages for death of intestate in a grade crossing accident. The order domes motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. AU concur, except Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and dismissal of the complaint for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion on the former appeal (245 App. Div. 561). (The judgment awards plaintiff damages for death of intestate in a grade crossing accident. The order domes motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Brinkerhoff v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 249 A.D. 923, 293 N.Y.S. 500, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

249 A.D. 923 (Brinkerhoff v. Pennsylvania Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related