Brinkerhoff v. Pennsylvania Railroad
This text of 249 A.D. 923 (Brinkerhoff v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. AU concur, except Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and dismissal of the complaint for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion on the former appeal (245 App. Div. 561). (The judgment awards plaintiff damages for death of intestate in a grade crossing accident. The order domes motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D. 923, 293 N.Y.S. 500, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brinkerhoff-v-pennsylvania-railroad-nyappdiv-1937.