Brinker v. Director of Revenue

400 S.W.3d 868, 2013 WL 2643780, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 705
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 11, 2013·No. No. ED 98911·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cynthia A. Blinker (Blinker) appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion for summary judgment following the trial court’s judgment sustaining the Director of the Department of Revenue’s (Director) suspension of Brinker’s driving privileges for driving while under the influence of alcohol. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brinker v. Director of Revenue, 400 S.W.3d 868, 2013 WL 2643780, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 705 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

400 S.W.3d 868 (Brinker v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.