Brink v. Home Insurance

2 A.D. 122
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 2 A.D. 122 (Brink v. Home Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brink v. Home Insurance, 2 A.D. 122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

The opinion of the judge at Special Term was as follows:

Gaynor, J.:

. It is the rule not to change the venue for the convenience of witnesses from any of the adjacent counties to New York county.

The county seat of Westchester county is convenient to New York city. This case is not so exceptional as to cause a departure from the rule. The long distances in the country, which necessitate changes of venue, do not exist hereabouts. It cannot be said to be any grave inconvenience to go a distance which takes only an hour or less.

The strong tone of the brief submitted is quite unnecessary. It stands on the alleged right of the defendant, whereas it is not a matter of right. The alleged injustice is imaginary. Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Broderick v. Mesa
178 A.D. 669 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
Larocque v. Conhaim
45 Misc. 234 (New York Supreme Court, 1904)
Quinn v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad
88 A.D. 57 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 A.D. 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brink-v-home-insurance-nyappdiv-1896.