Brink v. Decker
This text of 3 N.J.L. 902 (Brink v. Decker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The action below, was an action of trover, brought by Decker, for two horses, which he, as constable, under an execution which he had against one John B. Drake, had levied on, and taken into his possession; and he charges the defendant below, 71 rink, with taking and carrying away, and selling and dispor.l :g of them, which amounts to a conversion. According to i>.s isoks, an action of trover can be maintained on the facts disclosed by this state of the case, 6 Bac. 679, 1 Mod. 30, 2 Sand. 47; although goods are taken as a trespass, yet trover may he maintained, Cro. Car. 89. The only difficulty arising in this caséis, that the defendant below, should not have been charged with taking and carrying away the horses, but with finding them; but technical formality is not required in justice’s courts. If the record discloses facts, which if properly declared on, will entitle the plaintiff to recover on the action he brings, the Court will support it. I am, therefore, in favor of affirmance.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 N.J.L. 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brink-v-decker-nj-1811.