Bringle v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.

90 F.2d 1001, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4019
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJune 4, 1937
DocketNo. 7247
StatusPublished

This text of 90 F.2d 1001 (Bringle v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bringle v. Southern Cotton Oil Co., 90 F.2d 1001, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4019 (6th Cir. 1937).

Opinion

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

In this cause it appearing that there was a concurrent finding of facts by a special master and the District Judge, and it not appearing that there was a clear mistake in the findings of fact or any error in the application of the law to the facts, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the decree of the District Court be and is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 F.2d 1001, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bringle-v-southern-cotton-oil-co-ca6-1937.