Brine v. Brine
324 N.E.2d 910, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 730
Opinion
This is an appeal from a decree modifying an earlier decree for support entered upon a libel for divorce. In the posture in which this case comes to us, with no transcript of the evidence, no report of material facts and no voluntary report by the probate judge, no error appears where “all that is open is whether the decree could have been entered on the pleadings.” Bannish v. Bannish, 357 Mass. 279, 281 (1970). Frilich v. Altstein, ante, 720 (1975).
Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brine v. Brine, 324 N.E.2d 910, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 730 (Mass. Ct. App. 1975).
324 N.E.2d 910 (Brine v. Brine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Donoghue v. Donoghue
368 N.E.2d 818 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1977)
Kramer v. Kramer
341 N.E.2d 913 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1976)
Hinds v. Hinds
341 N.E.2d 702 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1976)