Home/Michigan Supreme Court/Brindley v. SEVERSTAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.

Brindley v. SEVERSTAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.

762 N.W.2d 494, 2009 WL 762452
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brindley v. SEVERSTAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.. Read the opinion of the Court — 485 Mich. 999 →
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided March 23, 2009·No. 137949·Published

Opinion

762 N.W.2d 494 (2009)

Alicia BRINDLEY, Max Franklin, and Barbara Franklin, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
SEVERSTAL NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 137949, COA No. 286155.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 23, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 12, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Henry v. Dow Chemical Co. (Docket No. 136298) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brindley v. SEVERSTAL NORTH AMERICA, INC., 762 N.W.2d 494, 2009 WL 762452 (Mich. 2009).

762 N.W.2d 494 (Brindley v. SEVERSTAL NORTH AMERICA, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.