Brimberg v. Frielich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brimberg v. Frielich

3 A.D.2d 840, 161 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5952

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 8, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 840 (Brimberg v. Frielich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brimberg v. Frielich, 3 A.D.2d 840, 161 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5952 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In a stockholder’s derivative action, the corporate defendants and an individual defendant moved to dismiss the amended complaint for insufficiency or to strike certain paragraphs therefrom or to make said complaint more definite and certain. Special Term granted the motion to the extent of striking paragraph 17 from each of the causes of action and otherwise denied the motion. The appeal is from (1) so much of an order dated January 7, 1957 as denied the motion, and from (2) so much of an order dated January 29, 1957 as on reargument adhered to the original determination. Order dated January 29, 1957, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order dated January 7, 1957 dismissed, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a stockholder’s derivative action, the corporate defendants and an individual defendant moved to dismiss the amended complaint for insufficiency or to strike certain paragraphs therefrom or to make said complaint more definite and certain. Special Term granted the motion to the extent of striking paragraph 17 from each of the causes of action and otherwise denied the motion. The appeal is from (1) so much of an order dated January 7, 1957 as denied the motion, and from (2) so much of an order dated January 29, 1957 as on reargument adhered to the original determination. Order dated January 29, 1957, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order dated January 7, 1957 dismissed, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 840, 161 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brimberg-v-frielich-nyappdiv-1957.