Brimberg Bros. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Brimberg Bros. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 559

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 20, 1958

DocketNo. 61957; protests 742424-G, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 40 Cust. Ct. 559 (Brimberg Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brimberg Bros. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 559 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

Opinions

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 Cust. Ct. 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brimberg-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1958.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack