Brim v. State

379 S.W.2d 664, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1008
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 3, 1964·No. 37029·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction under Art. 5221b-14 Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St., for making a false statement in writing with the intent to obtain benefits under the Texas Unemployment Act.

Trial was before the court on a plea of guilty and the court assessed a fine of $100.00 as punishment.

In the judgment appearing in the transcript the appellant was adjudged guilty of “false swearing” which is a felony.

The judgment is reformed so as to conform to the information and adjudge the appellant guilty of making a false statement in writing with the intent to obtain benefits under the Texas Unemployment Compensation Act.

No statement of facts accompanies the record and there are no bills of exception.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brim v. State, 379 S.W.2d 664, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1008 (Tex. 1964).

379 S.W.2d 664 (Brim v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

James Hardin Penn v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007
Johnson v. State
771 S.W.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1989)
In re C. E. H.
516 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Johnson v. State
478 S.W.2d 442 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Vasquez v. State
477 S.W.2d 629 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)