Brim v. State
12 So. 3d 923, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9974, 2009 WL 2096010
This text of 12 So. 3d 923 (Brim v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brim v. State, 12 So. 3d 923, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9974, 2009 WL 2096010 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
Robert James Brim appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction DNA testing filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. We affirm the denial without prejudice to any right Brim may have to raise a claim of bad faith destruction of the evidence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Moore v. State, 903 So.2d 238, 239-40 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Moore v. State
903 So. 2d 238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 So. 3d 923, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9974, 2009 WL 2096010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brim-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.