Brim v. Brim

189 S.E. 846, 183 Ga. 749, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 412
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 9, 1937
DocketNo. 11557
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 189 S.E. 846 (Brim v. Brim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brim v. Brim, 189 S.E. 846, 183 Ga. 749, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 412 (Ga. 1937).

Opinion

Beck, Presiding Justice.

1. Under the discretion which the judge is authorized to exercise in suits for temporary alimony, it can not be said that in view of all the evidence in the case the court erred in refusing temporary alimony as prayed for. Code, §§ 30-203, 30-205. The judge had the right to consider all the conduct of the wife in regard to the suit for divorce brought by her husband in a Florida court.

2. This court will not undertake to pass upon the regularity of the divorce proceedings instituted by Brim, to which an answer was filed by the [750]*750petitioner in this ease; but the fact that such a suit was filed and the wife filed an answer and raised no question as to the jurisdiction of the court, and offered no evidence to show that that court was without jurisdiction, could be' taken into consideration by the judge on the hearing of the application for temporary alimony.

No. 11557. February 9, 1937.

Judgment affirmed.

All Ihe Justices concur. J. N. Peacock Jr., for plaintiff. Frank 8. Twitty and J. D. Gardner, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bulloch v. Bulloch
4 S.E.2d 630 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 S.E. 846, 183 Ga. 749, 1937 Ga. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brim-v-brim-ga-1937.