Brill v. State

350 So. 2d 1141, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16837
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 24, 1977
DocketNo. GG-177
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 350 So. 2d 1141 (Brill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brill v. State, 350 So. 2d 1141, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16837 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant could have raised his complaint concerning the jury instructions on direct appeal. That issue is therefore not properly raised in a motion to vacate judgment and sentence. Ashley v. State, 350 So.2d 839 (Fla.1st DCA 1977).

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Selinka
14 Fla. Supp. 2d 61 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1985)
Gonzalez v. State
432 So. 2d 171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Izquierdo v. State
382 So. 2d 780 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Garcia v. Mid-Florida Hauling, Inc.
350 So. 2d 1141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
350 So. 2d 1141, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brill-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.