Brill v. State
350 So. 2d 1141, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16837
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 24, 1977·No. No. GG-177·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Appellant could have raised his complaint concerning the jury instructions on direct appeal. That issue is therefore not properly raised in a motion to vacate judgment and sentence. Ashley v. State, 350 So.2d 839 (Fla.1st DCA 1977).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brill v. State, 350 So. 2d 1141, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16837 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
350 So. 2d 1141 (Brill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Selinka
14 Fla. Supp. 2d 61 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1985)
Gonzalez v. State
432 So. 2d 171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Izquierdo v. State
382 So. 2d 780 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Garcia v. Mid-Florida Hauling, Inc.
350 So. 2d 1141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)