Brill v. Noekett
This text of 84 N.Y.S. 142 (Brill v. Noekett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon a verified petition alleging three months’ rent due and owing, and demand therefor, and upon a verified answer denying each and every allegation in said petition contained, except “that on or about the 9th day of March, 1903, one Max Brill demanded of this tenant the sum of five hundred dollars,” the trial justice, without any evidence that the rent claimed in the petition or any rent was due, rendered judgment by final order in favor of the landlord, awarding him.possession of the premises for nonpayment of rent. The final order must • therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.
Final order reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 N.Y.S. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brill-v-noekett-nyappterm-1903.