Brill v. Meek

20 Mo. 358
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided January 15, 1855·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Scott, Judge.

When an appeal has once been granted, the power over the subject is functus officio and cannot be exercised a second time. This has been the uniform practice. After a party, from any cause, has lost the benefit of his appeal, he is driven to his writ of error. The appeal is dismissed,

Judge Ryland concurring; Judge Leonard not upon the bench.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brill v. Meek, 20 Mo. 358 (Mo. 1855).

20 Mo. 358 (Brill v. Meek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rosser
91 P.2d 295 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1939)
State v. Keeney
159 P. 1165 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1916)
Carlberg v. Fields
146 N.W. 560 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1914)
Hill v. Keller
139 S.W. 523 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1911)
Reed v. Bright
134 S.W. 653 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1911)
State ex rel. Riefling v. Sale
133 S.W. 119 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1910)
Burdett v. Dale
69 S.W. 480 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1902)
Joseph Schnaider's Brewing Co. v. Levvie
41 Mo. App. 584 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1890)
Schmeer v. Schmeer
17 P. 864 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1888)
Chinn v. Davis
21 Mo. App. 363 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1886)
Harris v. Ferris
18 Fla. 81 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1881)
Samstag v. Conley
64 Mo. 476 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1877)