Brill v. Eastern New Jersey Power Co.

168 A. 461, 111 N.J.L. 224, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 318
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 27, 1933·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court by Circuit Court Judge Lawrence, to whom this ease was referred.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brill v. Eastern New Jersey Power Co., 168 A. 461, 111 N.J.L. 224, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 318 (N.J. 1933).

168 A. 461 (Brill v. Eastern New Jersey Power Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Faulks v. Schrider
99 F.2d 370 (D.C. Circuit, 1938)