Brill v. Division of Child Support Services/Lang

CourtSupreme Court of Delaware
DecidedSeptember 8, 2023
Docket286, 2023
StatusPublished

This text of Brill v. Division of Child Support Services/Lang (Brill v. Division of Child Support Services/Lang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brill v. Division of Child Support Services/Lang, (Del. 2023).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CARSON BRILL,1 § § No. 286, 2023 Respondent Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Family Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § File No. CS08-02892 DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT § Petition No. 22-00746 SERVICES/BIONCA LANG, § § Petitioner Below, § Appellee. §

Submitted: August 29, 2023 Decided: September 8, 2023

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; LEGROW and GRIFFITHS, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the response, it appears to

the Court that:

(1) On August 15, 2023, the respondent below-appellant, Carson Brill,

filed this appeal from a Family Court Commissioner’s order, dated July 18, 2023,

finding him in contempt of court for failing to pay his child support obligations and

committing him to Level III probation. The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice

directing Brill to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for this Court’s

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d). lack of jurisdiction to consider an appeal directly from a Family Court

Commissioner’s order.

(2) In his response to the notice to show cause, Brill recites equitable

principles. He does not address this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to entertain an appeal

from a Family Court Commissioner’s order.

(3) Under 10 Del. C. § 915(d) and Family Court Civil Rules 53.1(a), a

party’s right to appeal from a Commissioner’s order is to a judge of the Family

Court.2 This Court lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal directly from a Family

Court Commissioner’s order.3 Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),

that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ N. Christopher Griffiths Justice

2 10 Del. C. § 915(d)(1), (2) (governing appeals from final and interim orders issued by commissioners); Fam. Ct. Civ. R. 53.1(a) (“An interim or final order of a commissioner may be appealed to a judge of the [Family] Court....”). 3 See, e.g., Waples v. Div. of Child Support Servs., 2005 WL 1653768, at *1 (Del. June 23, 2005) (dismissing appeal from Family Court Commissioner’s order civilly committing appellant for contempt of court). 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 915
Delaware § 915(d)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brill v. Division of Child Support Services/Lang, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brill-v-division-of-child-support-serviceslang-del-2023.