Brill v. Brenner
This text of 66 Misc. 2d 501 (Brill v. Brenner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court erred in failing to uphold plaintiff’s claim for $20 for money loaned to defendant on July 4,1969 and not repaid. That claim is supported by testimony of plaintiff, and is admitted in the testimony of a witness called by defendant, defendant’s daughter, Susan Geller. There is no evidence in the record to the contrary.
[502]*502The judgment entered April 2, 1970, should be unanimously modified, .so as to award plaintiff $20, and as modified, the judgment should be affirmed, including the portion awarding defendant the sum of $8.82 on her counterclaim, without costs to either party in this court or in the court below.
The appeal from an order entered March 12, 1970, denying plaintiff’s posttrial motion to set aside the trial court’s decision, should be dismissed as academic, without costs. (Goldberg v. Orzac, 30 A D 2d 697.)
Concur — Lupiano, J. P., Streit and Gold, JJ.
Judgment modified, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 Misc. 2d 501, 321 N.Y.S.2d 467, 1971 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brill-v-brenner-nyappterm-1971.