Brill v. Brandt

263 A.D. 811, 31 N.Y.S.2d 674
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 19, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 263 A.D. 811 (Brill v. Brandt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brill v. Brandt, 263 A.D. 811, 31 N.Y.S.2d 674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Callahan, J.

(dissenting). I dissent as to appellant iSatenstein and vote to reverse the judgment and dismiss the complaint as to him on the ground that plaintiffs’ claim against Satenstein was on the note and was barred by the Statute of Limitations. (Woodruff v. Moore, 8 Barb. 171, 172; Blanchard v. Blanchard, 201 N. Y. 134.) The letters of Satenstein’s attorneys to the bank did not contain a written acknowledgment of the claim, signed by the party to be charged, within the provisions of section 59 of the Civil Practice Act so as to toll the statute.

Untermyer, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaad v. Hutchinson's Boat Works, Inc.
84 Misc. 2d 631 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)
500 Fifth Avenue, Inc. v. Nielsen
56 Misc. 2d 392 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1968)
Metropolitan Capital Corp. v. Janus
25 Misc. 2d 37 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Prospect Heights Hospital, Inc. v. Davis
22 Misc. 2d 511 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Meyn v. Schutte
20 Misc. 2d 471 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
United States v. Curtiss Aeroplane Co.
52 F. Supp. 328 (S.D. New York, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 A.D. 811, 31 N.Y.S.2d 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brill-v-brandt-nyappdiv-1941.