Bril v. Furman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bril v. Furman

548 So. 2d 730, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1930, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4626, 1989 WL 90923

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 15, 1989

DocketNo. 88-2593

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 548 So. 2d 730 (Bril v. Furman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bril v. Furman, 548 So. 2d 730, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1930, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4626, 1989 WL 90923 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for respective parties have conceded that the money judgment awarded Ms. Furman was miscalculated. Consequently, the final judgment is vacated with directions for the trial court to reduce the principal sum of the judgment in the amount of $419, and to recalculate interest accordingly. In all other respects, the judgment, as modified, is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for respective parties have conceded that the money judgment awarded Ms. Furman was miscalculated. Consequently, the final judgment is vacated with directions for the trial court to reduce the principal sum of the judgment in the amount of $419, and to recalculate interest accordingly. In all other respects, the judgment, as modified, is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

548 So. 2d 730, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1930, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4626, 1989 WL 90923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bril-v-furman-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack