Bril v. Furman
548 So. 2d 730, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1930, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4626, 1989 WL 90923
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 15, 1989·No. No. 88-2593·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Counsel for respective parties have conceded that the money judgment awarded Ms. Furman was miscalculated. Consequently, the final judgment is vacated with directions for the trial court to reduce the principal sum of the judgment in the amount of $419, and to recalculate interest accordingly. In all other respects, the judgment, as modified, is affirmed.
Affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bril v. Furman, 548 So. 2d 730, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1930, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4626, 1989 WL 90923 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
548 So. 2d 730 (Bril v. Furman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ivens Corp. v. Cohen
560 So. 2d 1352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)