Brigman v. State
Opinion
Where a defendant in a criminal case enters a plea of guilty, and, before sentence has been passed, moves the court to allow him to withdraw that plea and enter a plea of not guilty, and where the motion is denied and sentence is thereafter passed upon him, and he thereupon sues out a direct bill of exceptions, in which the only assignment of error is upon the refusal to allow him to withdraw his plea of guilty and enter a plea of not guilty, this court can'not entertain the bill of exceptions, since it contains no exception to the final judgment in the case. To give this court jurisdiction of a case, the [151] bill of exceptions must contain an assignment of error upon the final judgment rendered. Hester v. Mallary &c. Co., 142 Ga. 320 (82 S. E. 884), and cit.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
139 S.E. 154 (Brigman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.