Brigitte Starkey and David Starkey v. Diana Hiebler

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 19, 2026·No. 03-25-00030-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-25-00030-CV

Brigitte Starkey and David Starkey, Appellants v.

Diana Hiebler, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. C-1-CV-22-003363, THE HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM Appellants Brigitte Starkey and David Starkey filed a suggestion of bankruptcy June 5, 2026. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.1; see also Starkey v. Hiebler, No. 25-0954, 2026 Tex. LEXIS 442, at *1 (May 15, 2026) (denying Starkeys’ petition for review). Accordingly, this appeal is stayed. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. Any party may file a motion to reinstate the appeal if permitted by federal law or the bankruptcy court. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3(a). It is the parties’ responsibility to notify the Court as soon as possible if an event occurs that would allow reinstatement. Id. Failure to notify this Court of a lift of the automatic stay or the conclusion of the bankruptcy proceeding may result in the dismissal of the case for want of prosecution. See id. R. 42.3(b).

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Crump Bankruptcy Filed: June 19, 2026

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brigitte Starkey and David Starkey v. Diana Hiebler, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Brigitte Starkey and David Starkey v. Diana Hiebler (Brigitte Starkey and David Starkey v. Diana Hiebler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 362
11 U.S.C. § 362