Brigitte Starkey and David Starkey v. Diana Hiebler
This text of Brigitte Starkey and David Starkey v. Diana Hiebler (Brigitte Starkey and David Starkey v. Diana Hiebler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00030-CV
Brigitte Starkey and David Starkey, Appellants
v.
Diana Hiebler, Appellee
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. C-1-CV-22-003363, THE HONORABLE TODD T. WONG, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellants Brigitte Starkey and David Starkey filed a suggestion of bankruptcy
June 5, 2026. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.1; see also Starkey v. Hiebler, No. 25-0954, 2026 Tex.
LEXIS 442, at *1 (May 15, 2026) (denying Starkeys’ petition for review). Accordingly, this
appeal is stayed. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. Any party may file a motion to
reinstate the appeal if permitted by federal law or the bankruptcy court. See Tex. R. App. P.
8.3(a). It is the parties’ responsibility to notify the Court as soon as possible if an event occurs
that would allow reinstatement. Id. Failure to notify this Court of a lift of the automatic stay or
the conclusion of the bankruptcy proceeding may result in the dismissal of the case for want of
prosecution. See id. R. 42.3(b). Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Crump
Bankruptcy
Filed: June 19, 2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brigitte Starkey and David Starkey v. Diana Hiebler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brigitte-starkey-and-david-starkey-v-diana-hiebler-texapp-2026.