Brightwell v. Moultrie

Fourth Circuit

Brightwell v. Moultrie

551 F. App'x 57

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 22, 2014

DocketNo. 13-7373

StatusPublished

This text of 551 F. App'x 57 (Brightwell v. Moultrie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brightwell v. Moultrie, 551 F. App'x 57 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Brightwell appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brightwell v. Moul-[58]*58trie, No. 8:12-cv-01520-DKC, 2018 WL 4495793 (D.Md. Aug. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Brightwell appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brightwell v. Moul-[58]*58trie, No. 8:12-cv-01520-DKC, 2018 WL 4495793 (D.Md. Aug. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

551 F. App'x 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brightwell-v-moultrie-ca4-2014.