Brighton Manuf'g Co. v. Reliance Ins.

U.S. Circuit Court

Brighton Manuf'g Co. v. Reliance Ins.

33 F. 235, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2925

DecidedJuly 25, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 33 F. 235 (Brighton Manuf'g Co. v. Reliance Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brighton Manuf'g Co. v. Reliance Ins., 33 F. 235, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2925 (uscirct 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Blodgett, J.

The facts in this case are the same as in the preceding case; and the defenses set up that the risk was increased with the knowledge of the assured, of which no notice was given to the defendant; that the assured allowed the building to become vacant and unoccupied, without notice Lo¡the [236]*236defendant; and that, being a manufacturing establishment, it ceased to be operated without the consent of the defendant. I have already passed upon these defenses in the preceding case, and therefore the finding will be for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blodgett, J.

The facts in this case are the same as in the preceding case; and the defenses set up that the risk was increased with the knowledge of the assured, of which no notice was given to the defendant; that the assured allowed the building to become vacant and unoccupied, without notice Lo¡the [236]*236defendant; and that, being a manufacturing establishment, it ceased to be operated without the consent of the defendant. I have already passed upon these defenses in the preceding case, and therefore the finding will be for the plaintiff.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 F. 235, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brighton-manufg-co-v-reliance-ins-uscirct-1887.