Brighton Const. Inc. v. L & J ENTERPRISES, INC.

313 A.2d 617, 126 N.J. Super. 186
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brighton Const. Inc. v. L & J ENTERPRISES, INC.. Read the opinion of the Court — 121 N.J. Super. 152
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided January 4, 1974·Published

Opinion

126 N.J. Super. 186 (1974)
313 A.2d 617

BRIGHTON CONSTRUCTION, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
L & J ENTERPRISES, INC., DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BENJ. GRUNAUER COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 19, 1973.
Decided January 4, 1974.

Before Judges LYNCH, MEHLER and MICHELS.

Mr. Richard K. Rosenberg argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Heller & Laiks, attorneys; Mr. Richard K. Rosenberg, of counsel, and Mr. Herbert R. Ezor, on the brief).

Mr. Robert B. Hermes argued the cause for appellant (Hermes & Gitlin, attorneys; Mr. Robert B. Hermes of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Milton C. Yarrow argued the cause for third-party defendant-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Kole.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brighton Const. Inc. v. L & J ENTERPRISES, INC., 313 A.2d 617, 126 N.J. Super. 186 (N.J. Ct. App. 1974).

313 A.2d 617 (Brighton Const. Inc. v. L & J ENTERPRISES, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brighton Construction, Inc. v. L & J Enterprises, Inc.
313 A.2d 617 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)