Brighton Const. Inc. v. L & J ENTERPRISES, INC.

313 A.2d 617, 126 N.J. Super. 186
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedJanuary 4, 1974
StatusPublished

This text of 313 A.2d 617 (Brighton Const. Inc. v. L & J ENTERPRISES, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brighton Const. Inc. v. L & J ENTERPRISES, INC., 313 A.2d 617, 126 N.J. Super. 186 (N.J. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

126 N.J. Super. 186 (1974)
313 A.2d 617

BRIGHTON CONSTRUCTION, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
L & J ENTERPRISES, INC., DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BENJ. GRUNAUER COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 19, 1973.
Decided January 4, 1974.

Before Judges LYNCH, MEHLER and MICHELS.

Mr. Richard K. Rosenberg argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Heller & Laiks, attorneys; Mr. Richard K. Rosenberg, of counsel, and Mr. Herbert R. Ezor, on the brief).

Mr. Robert B. Hermes argued the cause for appellant (Hermes & Gitlin, attorneys; Mr. Robert B. Hermes of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Milton C. Yarrow argued the cause for third-party defendant-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Kole.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brighton Construction, Inc. v. L & J Enterprises, Inc.
313 A.2d 617 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
313 A.2d 617, 126 N.J. Super. 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brighton-const-inc-v-l-j-enterprises-inc-njsuperctappdiv-1974.