Brighton Const. Inc. v. L & J ENTERPRISES, INC.
This text of 313 A.2d 617 (Brighton Const. Inc. v. L & J ENTERPRISES, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BRIGHTON CONSTRUCTION, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
L & J ENTERPRISES, INC., DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BENJ. GRUNAUER COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges LYNCH, MEHLER and MICHELS.
Mr. Richard K. Rosenberg argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Heller & Laiks, attorneys; Mr. Richard K. Rosenberg, of counsel, and Mr. Herbert R. Ezor, on the brief).
Mr. Robert B. Hermes argued the cause for appellant (Hermes & Gitlin, attorneys; Mr. Robert B. Hermes of counsel and on the brief).
Mr. Milton C. Yarrow argued the cause for third-party defendant-respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Kole.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
313 A.2d 617, 126 N.J. Super. 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brighton-const-inc-v-l-j-enterprises-inc-njsuperctappdiv-1974.