Brightman v. Union Street Railway Co.
44 N.E. 1091, 167 Mass. 113, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 36
Opinion
By the Court. The fall of the plaintiff’s intestate was not due to his being allowed to remain on the step of the car. It was caused by his voluntarily jumping off when the car was in motion. It was not a part of the defendant’s duty to prevent a passenger from leaving the car while in motion, still less to prevent a trespasser from doing so.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brightman v. Union Street Railway Co., 44 N.E. 1091, 167 Mass. 113, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 36 (Mass. 1896).
44 N.E. 1091 (Brightman v. Union Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Elger v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
226 Mass. 84 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1917)
Chicago & G. T. Ry. Co. v. Hoffman
82 Ill. App. 453 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1899)