Brightman v. Rice
This text of 259 A.D. 978 (Brightman v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
-Decree affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts and for granting a new trial on the ground that the finding of abandonment is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (The decree denies the application of the petitioner and adjudges that he is not entitled to elect to take a share of the estate of defendant’s testatrix as in intestacy.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 978, 20 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brightman-v-rice-nyappdiv-1940.