Brightman v. Brightman
This text of 100 Mass. 238 (Brightman v. Brightman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The clause in Israel Brightman’s will devising certain real estate “ to Daniel and John Brightman and to their heirs and assigns,” taken by itself, gave them an estate in fee simple. The subsequent clause providing that “ if the said Daniel or John shall decease, leaving no issue of his body lawfully begotten, then what I have devised to such one, I here devise to the survivor thereof and his heirs and assigns,” created an executory devise limited upon that fee simple. Richardson v. Noyes, 2 Mass. 56. But the contingency did not happen; for Daniel died first, and left issue; and when John died Daniel did not survive him. Upon the decease of Daniel leaving issue, the contingency mentioned became impossible, and the estate in fee simple remained. Judgment for the tenant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 Mass. 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brightman-v-brightman-mass-1868.