Bright v. State

936 So. 2d 1209, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14817, 2006 WL 2527243
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 5, 2006
DocketNo. 1D05-5611
StatusPublished

This text of 936 So. 2d 1209 (Bright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bright v. State, 936 So. 2d 1209, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14817, 2006 WL 2527243 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse appellant’s sentence, because it exceeds the five-year statutory maximum for a third-degree felony, and remand for resentencing. See Ashley v. State, 850 So.2d 1265 (Fla.2003); White v. State, 892 So.2d 541 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

REVERSE and REMAND for further consistent proceedings.

ERVIN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. State
892 So. 2d 541 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Ashley v. State
850 So. 2d 1265 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
936 So. 2d 1209, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14817, 2006 WL 2527243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bright-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.