Bright v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
This text of 332 F. App'x 100 (Bright v. South Carolina Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Bernard Bright appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his request for a refund of the filing fee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bright v. S.C. Dep’t of Corr., No. 3:07-cv-00214-JFA (D.S.C. Apr. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
332 F. App'x 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bright-v-south-carolina-department-of-corrections-ca4-2009.