Bright v. Pike County

69 Mo. 519
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedApril 15, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 69 Mo. 519 (Bright v. Pike County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bright v. Pike County, 69 Mo. 519 (Mo. 1879).

Opinion

Henry, J.

Ambrose Coe was indicted for murder in the circuit court of Pike county. He was tried in Marion county on a change of venue, and the expense of boarding the petit jury was taxed as costs against Pike county by the circuit court of Marion. The county of Pike refused to pay the bill, and was sued in the circuit court, in which there was a judgment for plaintiffs, from which the county has appealed. The case of the State ex rel. v. Clark, State Auditor, 57 Mo. 25, is decisive of this. It was there held [520]*520that there is do provision* of law for the payment of such expenses by the State. Nor is there any law which authorizes the court to tax such costs against Pike county. Sections 1 and 4 of the act in relation to criminal costs, provide when costs shall be taxed against the county in which an indictment is found, and neither of those sections embraces the case under consideration. All concurring, the judgment of the circuit court is, therefore, reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schmelzel v. Board of County Commissioners
100 P. 106 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1909)
Person v. Ozark County
82 Mo. 491 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 Mo. 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bright-v-pike-county-mo-1879.