Bright v. O'Flaherty

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 26, 2009
• Docket: 08-8304
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8304

DAVID BRIGHT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PAUL O’FLAHERTY, Assistant Commissioner; R. MOATS, Case Manager; N. ROUSE, Warden; STEWART NATHAN; DAVID P. KENNEDY; MICHAEL O. DOYLE; GARY D. MAYNARD; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (1:08- cv-00699-RWT)

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 26, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Bright, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip M. Pickus, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Bright appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Bright v. O’Flaherty, No. 1:08-cv-00699-RWT (D. Md.

Oct. 16, 2008). We further deny Bright’s motions to remand and

to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED