Bright v. Mountain City Banking Co.
This text of 3 Pennyp. 478 (Bright v. Mountain City Banking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence offered was rightly rejected. The claim was neither evidence of payment on the note in suit nor of set-off against it. It arose out of a separate transaction, and the claim was barred by the statute of limitations. The taking of the note by the bank was not ultra vires. The express authority given to invest its capital in notes and to purchase and hold securities in payment of the debts due it permitted this note to be taken. We discover no error in the record.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Pennyp. 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bright-v-mountain-city-banking-co-pactcomplschuyl-1883.