Bright v. McGowan

New York Court of Appeals

Bright v. McGowan

925 N.E.2d 81, 14 N.Y.3d 745, 899 N.Y.S.2d 749

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 16, 2010

Docket85 SSM 1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 925 N.E.2d 81 (Bright v. McGowan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bright v. McGowan, 925 N.E.2d 81, 14 N.Y.3d 745, 899 N.Y.S.2d 749 (N.Y. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied. In opposition to defendants’ prima facie case, plaintiffs raised a triable issue of fact.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied. In opposition to defendants’ prima facie case, plaintiffs raised a triable issue of fact.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

925 N.E.2d 81, 14 N.Y.3d 745, 899 N.Y.S.2d 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bright-v-mcgowan-ny-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack