Bright v. McGowan

925 N.E.2d 81, 14 N.Y.3d 745, 899 N.Y.S.2d 749
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 16, 2010·No. 85 SSM 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied. In opposition to defendants’ prima facie case, plaintiffs raised a triable issue of fact.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bright v. McGowan, 925 N.E.2d 81, 14 N.Y.3d 745, 899 N.Y.S.2d 749 (N.Y. 2010).

925 N.E.2d 81 (Bright v. McGowan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. McDade
925 N.E.2d 92 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)